Review your content’s performance and reach.
Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics.
Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing.
Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them.
add to folder:
Questions? Please contact [email protected]
On April 21, 2021, along with the proposal for a Regulation on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and as part of the broader “Artificial Intelligence Package,” the European Commission issued the proposal for a Regulation on machinery products that will replace the Machinery Directive (Directive 2006/42/EC) currently in force. In our two-part article, we will investigate the crucial aspects of the proposal, considering the discussion on the legislative procedure by European institutions. In this first part, we will focus on the new obligations on manufacturers, distributors, and importers against the background of the digital transition. In the second part, we will analyze the major intersection points of the machinery safety legislation with the evolution of digital technologies, including AI, IT security and the human-machine relationship, particularly regarding the provisions of the proposal for a Regulation on machinery products that will govern these aspects.
Current market framework, Machinery Directive and digitalization
The machinery sector is a key part of the engineering industry and one of the driving industrial pillars of the EU economy. According to the recent report released by the Technopolis Group for the Commission, the production of machinery and equipment manufacturing was the main business activity of 80,000 enterprises across the EU in 2018. The sector employed 3 million people in the same year. The total annual turnover of the sector amounts to approximately EUR700 billion (Eurostat, SBS, SBS_NA_IND_R2). In 2018, the Member States with the highest value added generated by the sector were Germany (EUR108 billion) and Italy (EUR37.2 billion), followed by France and the Netherlands.
In this context, Directive 2006/42/EC (the Directive) defines a harmonized regulatory framework for placing machinery products on the single market, ensuring free movement within the EU and a high level of protection for users and exposed people. The Directive applies to a wide range of products; from construction machinery and lawnmowers to 3D printers and robots. In addition to machines stricto sensu, the scope of application covers other related products, such as safety components and partly completed machinery products. At present, the aim is to ensure a sustainable recovery from the COVID-19 crisis, fostering innovation but safeguarding the competitiveness of European manufacturers and designers on a global level playing field.
Despite several technological and market changes, in 2018 the Commission assessed that the Directive is still relevant towards the achievement of its goals and consistent with other relevant national, European, and international legislation. However, at the same time, the Commission highlighted some critical issues in terms of effectiveness in facing the challenges posed by emerging digital technologies, such as AI and IoT (Internet of Things), and efficiency concerning costs to be incurred for compliance with the requirements set out by the Directive. In this scenario, the Commission pointed out the need to:
For instance, a potential new risk associated with technological progress is the updating/modification of hardware or software components of a machine after this has been placed on the market or put into service, which could cause the latter to behave in a way not originally foreseen by the manufacturer, requiring a new conformity assessment to be performed and a new CE marking to be affixed.
As part of the following 2020 report on implications of AI, IoT and robotics, the Commission also concluded that these technologies pose new challenges in terms of product safety and liability such as connectivity, autonomy, data dependency, opacity, products and systems complexity, software updates and a more complex security and supply chain management.
New regulation on machinery products: entry into force, applicability, and transitional period
The Machinery Directive will be superseded by adopting an EU regulation, which – by virtue of its general scope and direct applicability – will ensure greater legal certainty and a high level of harmonization of health and safety requirements in the design, construction, and trade of machinery products throughout the EU.
In addition, the proposal has been issued along with the proposal for a Regulation on AI, considering all changes resulting from the digital transition and the impact of new technologies on European product safety legislation. Consistently, both the Regulation on machinery products (the Machinery Regulation) and the Regulation on AI will apply to machinery products. In the second part of this article, we will look more closely at the intersections points of the Machinery Regulation with the main emerging digital technologies, as well as the Regulation on AI and other applicable legislation.
It should be noted that the principle of technological neutrality, which already permeated the text of the Directive, remains crucial: the Machinery Regulation does not lay down specific technical solutions to be adopted to comply with safety requirements, which will be a matter for manufacturers.
According to the proposal, the Machinery Regulation will enter into force on the 20th day following its publication but will become applicable 30 months after its entry into force. The Directive will be repealed on the same date. A transitional period is also provided during which it will still be possible to place on the market machinery complying with the Directive and not yet with the Regulation, particularly within 42 months from the date of entry into force.
Following the publication of the draft Machinery Regulation (April 2021), the European Parliament proposed several amendments at its first reading. Among them, as we will see, the proposals include extending the deadline for the application of the Machinery Regulation and the repeal of the Directive from 30 to 48 months after the entry into force and to extend the transitional period from 42 to 60 months.
Major novelties in the Machinery Regulation compared to the Directive
The Machinery Regulation introduces an explicit reference to modifications to products already placed on the market or put into service. It will apply not only to new machinery products, as provided for in the Directive, but also to products that have undergone “substantial modifications” such as to entail changes in the original performances, purpose, use or type of the products, so the product is considered as new, also with respect to the different or higher risks involved. The user who makes such changes will have to fulfil the same obligations under the legislation as manufacturers.
A new conformity assessment will only be required relating to those parts of the product that have been substantially modified unless the modification affects the entire product. The subject involved will not be required to repeat tests and prepare new documentation in respect of aspects not affected by the changes. Safety updates, repair and maintenance works do not constitute substantial modifications.
Two new economic operators: importer and distributor
The Machinery Regulation introduces two new figures: the importer and the distributor.
The “importer” is the person who places a product from a third country on the European market for the first time. It is the importer’s responsibility to ensure that the manufacturer has fulfilled all obligations in terms of product conformity with the provisions of the Machinery Regulation. In line with this, the manufacturer is obliged to indicate its contact details on the product.
The “distributor” is the person, other than the manufacturer and the importer, who makes a product available on the market. The distributor is responsible for verifying, before making a product available on the market, that the machine bears the CE marking, that it is accompanied by the necessary documentation, instructions, and information, and that the manufacturer and the importer have indicated on the product/packaging the identification elements of the product and their contact details. This is a less onerous responsibility compared to manufacturers’ and importers’ obligations. Just like the importer, the distributor must also ensure that the conformity of the product is not compromised during storage and transport.
Security components: software is included
The Machinery Regulation also adds digital components, including software, to the definition of “safety component.” As a result, software that fulfils safety functions and is placed on the market independently will have to be accompanied by an EU declaration of conformity and, where applicable, instructions and information necessary for its use, as well as bear the CE marking.
EU Declaration of Conformity
The “EU Declaration of Conformity” replaces the “EC Declaration of Conformity” referred to in the Directive. If more than one EU act applies to a single product requiring it, a single EU declaration of conformity must be drawn up.
Towards digital documentation to the overall objective of simplification
For practical purposes and to reduce environmental impact, the manufacturer will need to be able to make the necessary documentation available digitally (EU declaration of conformity, instructions and information), without prejudice to the obligation to provide a hard copy if required. In this respect, one of the latest proposed amendments refers to the requirement that the documentation and information is downloadable and savable throughout the entire life-cycle of the machine product.
In certain cases, national competent authorities could reasonably request to make the source code or programmed logic included in the technical documentation available to verify the compliance of the product with the health and safety requirements in Annex III. However, some amendments propose the deletion of such provision.
High-risk machinery products: will it be necessary to go through the notified body?
With reference to conformity assessment for machines listed in Annex I (high-risk products) and those that will be added in line with technological developments, the Machinery Regulation excludes the possibility for the manufacturer to apply the internal production control procedure. Therefore, examination by a notified body will always be necessary, even if the manufacturer applies harmonized relevant standards and whatever procedure is followed. On the contrary, some amendments have proposed to maintain the possibility upon manufacturers to also apply the internal production control procedure (module A) in Annex VI for “potentially” high-risk machinery products. As we will discuss in more detail in the second part of this article, the amendments include a proposal to replace, throughout the entire text, the reference to machine products presenting “high risks” by “potentially high risks.”
Further amendments: scope of application, information asymmetry and sanctions minimum amount
Other amendments were also proposed to clarify the scope of application, with particular regard to the exclusion from the Machinery Regulation of:
Non-type-approved, off-road and (also but not exclusively intended for) competition vehicles, e-bikes, e-scooters, and similar means of transport, as well as specific equipment for use in fairgrounds or amusement parks should be included.
It was also proposed to add and clarify certain definitions, including “partly completed machinery,” based on the need to better distinguish definitions relating to partly completed machinery from those relating to other categories of machine products, also in relation to the requirements and obligations of economic operators, including conformity assessment procedures.
Further proposed amendments aim to reduce the information asymmetry between machine products manufacturers and end-users by requiring the manufacturer to consider the safety impact on consumers and, upon request, to provide information on significant details that may affect the safe operation when a machine product is installed on a vehicle. The manufacturer should also provide users with information on security updates and identified cyber risks in a timely and reliable manner.
Lastly, the amendments suggest that, in the event of a serious breach of the Machinery Regulation, a minimum amount of sanctions (to be determined by Member States) of at least 3% of the worldwide turnover achieved by the economic operator in the previous fiscal year should be introduced.
Next steps and second part of the article
Even though the Machinery Regulation draft is currently being discussed by the European institutions, it is clearly driving towards an effective and timely overcoming of the major limits of the Directive, which is essentially structured in the adaptation of the previous regulatory framework to the new technological and market context, but also in the simplification and digitalization of administrative requirements.
As for the next steps, the analysis of the proposed amendments will take place in the European Parliament’s Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection on February 28, 2022, and the vote is scheduled for March 16-17, 2022. We will follow and analyze the evolution of the draft until the final version is published.
We will soon publish the second part of our analysis, where we will discuss the main points of intersection of the machine safety legislation with the evolution of digital technologies, including AI, IT security and the man-machine relationship, particularly regarding the provisions of the Machinery Regulation that will govern these aspects.
add to folder:
If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected].
© Copyright 2006 – 2022 Law Business Research
Review your content’s performance and reach.